The OPP found a charge of Discreditable Conduct was warranted. The Police Services Act states there must be sufficient grounds to believe misconduct occurred and D C O’Brien acted in a disorderly manner or in a ma n ner prejudicial to discipline or likely to bring discredit upon the reputation of t h e police force. She acknowledged she could have been more patient, and, in her review of the interview in June 2019, she realized she became frustrated with the victim’s lack of detail.” “She acknowledged it was ch allenging to elicit disclosure from Witness #1.(the victim) She acknowledged she could have done better in the interview, stating she should have “taken a step back and tried again.” She regretted she did not treat Witness #1 better. T he Suspected Child Abuse and Neglect (SCAN) Program at SickKids is managed by a team of healthcare professionals at the hospital who offer care, support and assessment to children and teenagers who may have been maltreated, and their families.Īccording to the OPP report DC O’Brien admitted she could have handled the interview in a more sensitive manner. The victim was interviewed by the SCAN program at Sick Kids Hospital as well, who found her testimony to be consistent with someone who had been sexually assaulted.
This, despite the fact that DC O’Brien had training extensive relevant training including Octobe r 2011, DRPS, Investigating Crime against Children, October 2015, Ontario Police College ( OPC), Investigative Interviewing, September 2015 OPC, Crimes against Children conference, August 2017.
Regardless of the evidence provided, it should be take n as valid unless evidence proved otherwise. It is important to recognize the role police officers play in the process of recovery f or victims. The negative and interrogative practice used in these police interviews contributed to secondary victimization. Her approach risked an extremely destructive effect on the victim ‘ s well – being and her willingness to disclose, in addition to the impact available quality of the evidence could be garnered for the criminal justice system processing of the sexual assault case. She did not reflect a position of neutrality but rather a position of d o ubt, and needed to respon d with pa tience and respect. D / C O’Brien took a ske p tic stance and approach to establishing whether the victim is telling the truth. Secondary victimization is a result of blame, stigmatizing responses, and negative treatment. “DC O’Brien contributed to the victim experiencing secondary victimization. She provided the following information in her report:
Discord nitro codes generator professional#
In December 2020, the OIPRD directed the public complaint be invest igated by the OPP Professional Standards Unit.Ī review of the 10 year old girl’s video statements to D C O’Brien was completed by Detective Staff Sergeant Bednarczyk of the OPP Victim Response Unit. The father was not happy with that and filed a complaint with the OIPRD. DC O’Brien still declined to lay charges. That internal investigation also found no reasonable prospect for conviction even though one of the officers involved in the inquiry found the child victim credible and recommended charges be laid. The father filed a complaint and the Peterborough Police Service Professional Standards Bureau ( PSB) investigated. He also alleged DC O’Brien failed to properly investigate the sexual assault allegation because she did not follow up on specific investigative evidence. The girl’s father accused DC O’Brien of being abusive toward his daughter during her initial interview by badgering her and repeatedly confronting his daughter about lying. The young girl reported she was sexually assaulted by her stepfather. D C O’Brien conducted a twelve-month investigation and concluded there were insufficient grounds to proceed with charges. The girl’s father had reported the incidents to Peterborough Police and was later interviewed by DC O’Brien. The initial investigation into the sexual assault allegations began in 2019.
0 kommentar(er)
